it wasnt an advisory request. sessions laid out the illegalities of, his forced recusal, the shady scope of the witch hunt (clarity) and conflicts of interest that are public sector information of the witch hunt, as well as the legality of his unrecusal. he was giving SCOTUS a heads up as to what is actually happening hence the [clas letter] as opposed to the narrative and rhetoric so they wouldnt be caught off guard and forced to address sessions actions publicly in a mockingbird shit storm without any warning, and without knowing what sessions was doing and why.
did you read the post anon? casual convorsation? we may not know he has the legal grounds yet, but SCOTUS does, thats why he informed them of those grounds. he wasnt asking advice or permission in my opinion. he was telling them
>hey…see all this fuckery? imma take care of it, heres the legal grounds. now you know whats up when shit hits the fan and MSM tries to force your hand against america.
do ya really thing POTUS and session would walk such a fine line with SCOTUS on the eve of the storm? they do everything by the book. they have to
>What book
wow for a lawfag i never woulda expected such idiocy. you want to argue the semantics of a figure of speech? c'mon faggot you can do better than that. im not even arguing your knowledge of the law. your interpretation of the Q post is incorrect in my opinion and the law/precident youre talking about doesnt even apply.
you dont need to announce your newfaggotry anon. its like your starting off with an excuse in case your post isnt good. just post and anons will reply if we want.
goodbye.