Re: pharma cures
This has been going on far longer than you think.
Poliomyelitis. It's a VIRUS. Got that? VIRUS. Which is something that antibiotics cannot deal with. Polio outbreak in late 40's was a HUGE issue. Massive amounts of research. $$$$$$$
Polio was cured by Frederick Klenner, MD. Reidsville NC.
There was an outbreak of Polio in Reidsville in 1948. He violated orders and cured every one of them with massive injections of sodium ascorbate. That's vitamin C. You cannot patent a vitamin. No patent, no massive profits.
His report on how Polio could be cured was published a year later (Southern Medicine and Surgery in July of 1949)
Think about how much money was on the table. He was not just ignored,, he was opposed. What is the real story on his son? It's not a game.
Back to the poliomyelitis virus. Massive injections of sodium ascorbate destroyed the virus, curing the patients. Klenner knew this because he was treating viral pneumonia with injected sodium ascorbate throughout the 1940's and that work was published in 1948.
Why are we spending billions to find a "cure" for all these virus infections when the medical industry has known since the 1940's that a cure exists? Because you can't patent a vitamin.
How much money does it cost to get FDA approval of a new drug or treatment? Lots… except that sodium ascorbate for injection is already a part of the USP. These are the reasons why there are no studies done. Why would they want a cure published?
More fun. Cancer. The first step is always hidden: biopsy the wallet. Determine course of treatment to maximize transfer of wealth. Treat. Send home to die. What will sodium ascorbate do to cancer? Whatever happened to Dr. Riordan? (Riordan protocol IVC). Incredibly effective against breast cancer.
Burzynski. Antineoplastin therapy. How long has it been in clinical trials? What are the results? Why won't it be approved? 1. No explanation of efficacy. 2. No toxicity. 3. FDA will not issue a drug license to an individual, only to a corporation. For meaning on that, see Hale v Henkel. This is critical because sodium ascorbate won't cross the blood brain barrier, so Burzynski's treatment is critical for brain tumors.
Rife. Think that's been lost? That would pretty much destroy the current medical industry.
Why won't medical insurance pay for this stuff? It's now "acceptable standard of care". What did TGE say in the SOTUA about "experimental treatments"?
Changing gears. Heart disease, EDTA chelation therapy is actively suppressed. Why might that be? Cabbage funds teaching hospitals.
Who controls the curriculum of medical schools? The AMA. What controls the FDA, NIH, AMA? Who decides what is published in MEDLINE? Doctors only know what they are taught.
"Acceptable Standards of Care" is the key phrase. A medical license is literally a license to kill. Doctors can't be sued or prosecuted except for violations of "acceptable standards of care." Malpractice suits are almost always about what the doctor did not do.
Want lots of research fun? Look at the implementation of arthroscopic surgery. Cholecystectomy. What happens if the surgeon, looking at a 2-D screen, nicks a bile duct? Death sentence. How did the surgeons get trained? Human guinea pigs were convinced they needed their gall bladder removed, then used for surgical training. If there were problems (bile duct injury) they were all sent to the same people, lied to, prescribed the same medications designed to make their symptoms worse but conceal the real problem. Faster death, get rid of the evidence.
Who funds quackwatch? Why? The narrative.
Virus infections (Sodium Ascorbate / Rife)
Cancer (Multiple Cures)
Heart disease. (Sodium Ascorbate, EDTA, chlorine dioxide)
Medical insurance = wealth transfer scheme. How much will a person pay to have their health or save their life?