>>308479 >>308493 >>308502

>When quoting Q, please try to avoid including his trip code.

yup, this.

seconded, tripled, multiplied.

it takes seconds: clean that shit up.

HAVE SOME ANON PRIDE, FER FOK'S SAKES.

don't drop us ugly shit like >>308251 (not this thread) did.

That's definitely not autist-worthy.

>>308624

> Not on github.

<BECAUSE NOT Q

>>308696

because ES was not thre in person, but on screen.

the picture shows that, whereas just a pic of ed on screen wouldn,'t.

<photojournalism

<logic

hey Q team, silent ones, operators: thanks again for an amazing evening, last night.

of course shills are back at it today, digging in wrong directions, concernfags be concernfagging (how long until the next "hey guys what if Q doesn't come back?" is anybody's guess, if it didn't happen already)…

but it was, and still is, awesome. Thanks again for letting us see more…

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

allright, GODSPEED

>>308748

we see what you're doing.

>>308760

nope

>>308807

they can't fire him if he's just a ghost

>>308823

y u index?

qcodefag.github.io

>>308836

>too many rules ruin the bread.

not everyone will follow, that's normal.

But too many newfags that can't be bothered to learn how to copypaste also shit bread up

(like all the ( you )s on this thread right now…)

>>308953

yes.

Bro, ever had to catch up 7 breads when Q drops and the damn fans make bread fly like crazy?

And you just want to go grab your caps quickly but there's a dozen of these shitty pastes that bring no new info at all?

It's a bit like putting a (not this thread) after referencing a comment from an other thread: it's not a rule, it's not enforced.

But i'm very, very glad to see many anons adopting the measure. Don't expect all of them to do it, of course, but the more that do, the comfyer the board is.

Same for needlessly copypasting Q'S trip (i don't care about the Q at the end, that's fine by me)…

>>309008

>burn breads

indeed…

can't be avoided when you try to

<archive everything

>>309082

>WE The People

yes

<our leaders

no.

trying to control the general too much is no good, it needs a measure of chaos. Of course too much is not good either.

one idea would be for archiving anons to make "best ofs" (sort of like Notable posts, but extended), but it's lot of work to keep up

>>309104

if he's talking about a random fb page making promises they can't keep, it's even less than a nuthinburger - a subnothingbuger

>>309113

locked board, separate from here would work.

but it would inevitably be accused of censorship, favoritism, etc, because obviously subjective… as long as anon does good work, it could work.

I'd love to go back and read threads missed since the beginning, but i can barely keep up real time, that'd be impossible. A solid selection would help there.

But i'd say it's pretty low-priority compared to much other tasks