Anonymous ID: d127c6 Sept. 18, 2018, 9:58 p.m. No.3083966   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3989 >>4170 >>4379 >>4424

>>3083859

>>3083874

It’s what’s not said in the remainder of the article. 1st quoted paragraph below is the one right after the anon’s quote thru the end of article. GJ mentions Wray in only that one and doesn’t build a case against him like he does RR in the rest of the article. I had same 1st reaction, but context and lack of a case against Wray was telling. GJ would have called Wray out like RR, but did not. Trust Wray.

>While Schiff is notorious for hyperbole, his assertion of a “red line” is rather stunning. Does it mean Rosenstein and Wray will defy the president’s direct order and continue to obstruct lawful subpoenas issued by congress? If so, they should be fired for rank insubordination.

 

In the alternative, they may endeavor to delay or “slow roll” the release of documents hoping that the political winds may shift or that control of Congress itself will change hands in the upcoming election.

 

Rosenstein has every reason to suppress the records. They may incriminate him. He affixed his signature to the final renewal of the FISA warrant application to continue spying on Carter Page. He vouched for the authenticity and veracity of the information contained therein. But if it was largely based on a “dossier” that was unverified and uncorroborated, Rosenstein may have been complicit in misusing his position of power in pursuit of a president who was wrongfully targeted by the FBI and DOJ.

 

Either way, the future does not bode well for Rod Rosenstein. He appointed a special counsel without proper authority.

 

He then refused to recuse himself as a key witness in the very case he oversees.

 

All along the way, he has been obstructing Congress by withholding records they are entitled to have.

 

He surely knows what the declassified documents portend for himself.