Anonymous ID: fd2353 Sept. 19, 2018, 4:41 a.m. No.3085861   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5874

>>3085854

Yeah, I watched an E-4B Nightwatch head back to it's home base in Nebraska yesterday. I still think SIGINT aircraft are worth noting, as they may be watching someone on behalf of Q.

Anonymous ID: fd2353 Sept. 19, 2018, 4:45 a.m. No.3085882   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5889

>>3085871

Brazilian ATC is run by the military and uses radar. Local airports can also see flocks of birds on their radar, so I don't think you are totally correct about this.

Anonymous ID: fd2353 Sept. 19, 2018, 4:47 a.m. No.3085885   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3085874

The Nighthawk is the F-117A. The E-4B is the Nightwatch.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_F-117_Nighthawk

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_E-4

Anonymous ID: fd2353 Sept. 19, 2018, 4:59 a.m. No.3085930   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5942

>>3085921

Not really, even weather satellites can use radar to track storms.

 

What I do find odd is that satellites can allegedly read newspaper headlines from space (from the Hexagon era onwards), but they can't find MH370. Hmm…

Anonymous ID: fd2353 Sept. 19, 2018, 5:06 a.m. No.3085959   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3085942

I am considering that. Synthetic Aperture Radar can cover hundreds of miles in detail.

 

The more modern spy satellites could cover the oceans quite easily, the only constraints are orbital path and time.