This – the only thing I filter is gore. Just ignore and keep going.
Fuck off with that. He built a company, fought back under pressure, litigated and negotiated with the DOJ and State Department – effectively forcing them to concede, for all time, that weapons schematics are a form of speech entitled to protection under the First Amendment (as well as the Second).
Now (((they))) are attempting an end run through litigation by a who's-who of the most corrupt state AGs, plus this latest sex assault B.S. to try to take him down personally. And you say he is deep state?
Guys, what am I missing here? I read the whole article, and I'm not seeing anything that could be described as "sex assault." Age of consent in Texas is 17. The girl in question seems to have arranged the encounter just as intentionally as he did. Where's the allegedly illegal conduct?
https://www.statesman.com/news/breaking-news/breaking-austin-man-center-printed-gun-debate-faces-sex-assault-charge/AnteUx5fI7LpNg6yg0Z1JN/