>>3088451

>Yes, this General is a filthy scumbag leaking traitor.

There is more to this story.

Look who shows up in it…

>Cartwright spoke to the reporters "to protect American interests and lives in a story they had already written," said defense attorney Greg Craig, Obama's first White House counsel. "In his conversations with these two reporters, Gen. Cartwright was engaged in a well-known and understood practice of attempting to save national secrets, not disclosing classified information. His effort to prevent publication of information that might harm American lives or national security does not constitute a violation of any law."

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/retired-general-charged-in-probe-of-classified-information-disclosure-229891

Greg Craig

Of Skadden. Mixed up in the Manafort and Ukraine case.

What a coincidence!

Iran - check

Nuclear - check

Craig - check

RR - check

There is much more to this story, guaranteed.

I don't think we can draw conclusions what side Cartwright is REALLY on.

>>3088672

We've only gotten this far because Trump DECLAS the FISA.

But Huber wanted the parts redacted that are related to cases he's bringing against the agents, spies, press, etc that were involved.

The final DECLAS of the 20 pages represents the end of Huber's process - he has the indictments in hand.

BUT note that most of the FISA pages are related to collection methods, minimization techniques, etc that will NOT be DECLAS, ever.

>>3088707

>Gen. Cartwright is related to our gud buddy Peter ‘cooperating witness’ Strzok by marriage.

I think that might have been disproven - different family. Need better sauce.

>Classified Leaking is black hat.

Generally agree, but he claims that his conversations were trying to minimize what got released.

>Who benefited?

Ask why would Obama want to release - or expose - Stuxnet?

Whose op was it?

Did it help close the Iran deal?

Did it help the global black-market HEU business (shutting down Iran's ability)?

Or was Iran the center of the black-market HEU business, and some white-hats did Stuxnet?

I really don't know the answers… but I'm guessing there is a larger story here.

>>3088815

>Ask why would Obama want to release - or expose - Stuxnet?

I think this anon nails it -

>>3088824

Stuxnet was slowing the Net Present Value equation of that future investment timeline.

Some boy scouts in the spy community created Stuxnet to slow down Iran, but it went against cabal plans.

The cabal leaked its existence.

But was Cartwright behind the leak, or trying to suppress the leak damage and had to be stopped.

That is harder to know.

Are we forgetting about his prior sex accusation, partly from his time in Georgia (the country)?

https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/24/us/politics/24pentagon.html

The Marine Corps officer who has been called President Obama’s favorite general — and one considered a leading candidate for chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — was investigated and cleared of accusations that he had a sexual relationship with a subordinate, according to documents released Wednesday.

…

But during the contentious review process that led to a new White House strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, senior officers — including Admiral Mullen and Gen. David H. Petraeus — were reported to have felt that General Cartwright went behind their backs to align himself too closely with Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and others in the White House against the consensus advice of the military and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates.

It's an enigma.

>>3089031

>The #MeToo construct is necessary

Except the #MeToo movement has MOSTLY taken down Hollywood, MSM, and corrupt politicians.

So, I don't think the CABAL were originally behind it.

But they are going to use it's momentum for their own purposes.