Anonymous ID: a5e49a Sept. 19, 2018, 11:29 a.m. No.3089294   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9326

Are they both telling the truth?

 

We were all young once and we all knew a few rascals. One rascal trick was to give someone else's name if (you) wanted to get you leg over without any repercussions, and what could be funnier than using the name of someone who was respectable and dead straight?

 

It happens.

 

There is far too much evidence pointing towards a set up in this case; not least, Feinstein leaving the information drop until the last minute to ensure that there was no time for an investigation before the vote.

 

In this case it is necessary that this accusation is proved beyond all reasonable doubt, otherwise it cannot be allowed to stand, because to allow it to stand is going to allow anyone to destroy a nomination without evidence.

 

How did Blasey Ford make the identification? If she claims it was from a previous meeting that needs to be corroborated; when was it, where was it, and who witnessed it.?

Anonymous ID: a5e49a Sept. 19, 2018, 12:06 p.m. No.3089693   🗄️.is 🔗kun

THAT revelation from Stormy Daniels;

 

was a fiction lifted from the pages of "Justine" by the Marquis de Sade, a work familiar to the more perverted Democrats. It was of course a trap to try and invite a denial which could then be mocked.

 

Campbell, a drunken and disgusting Labour Party (UK) political hack did the same sort of thing when he invented the story that John Major always tucked his shirt into his underpants, an accusation which for some reason was politically damaging.

 

I didn't read all of Justine, I didn't like it and don't recommend it, but I do remember that bit; same grammar, vocabulary and syntax. .