>>3090610 (pb)
trash 80's were badass.. The cocos were technically better at… everything vs an apple II/IIc, due to the II/IIc's using a 6502 and the coco's using a 6809 processor.
Apple just did marketing better.
>>3090610 (pb)
trash 80's were badass.. The cocos were technically better at… everything vs an apple II/IIc, due to the II/IIc's using a 6502 and the coco's using a 6809 processor.
Apple just did marketing better.
>APERGGGGGGGGGG
Imagine my shock at the unprovoked attack.
You sure you're ready to post here?
Yeah, pretty much. It's more about buying as local and as healthily grown as possible; the corporate food chain is comped.
>"syrup"
Do you mean high fructose corn syrup? Because that's what I mean :D
Sorry for not being clear; I figured most anons would get it ;)
Because high fructose corn syrup has no sugar in it; it was created as a sugar substitute you silly asshole.
Then why did the high fructose corn syrup proponents fail to get it classified legally as a "sugar" on FDA compliant labels?
Good day :)