Behind in the bread, sorry if a repost.

Now a 'classmate' of Ford's is claiming, per a now deleted farcebook post, she heard people at the school discuss the assault blah, blah

Some interesting points. She lives in Mexico so it's easier to poison the well, she has no proof and removed the post because:

"It served its purpose and I am now dealing with a slew of requests for interview"

These loonie birds are starting to come out of the closet. The only thing she fails to mention is how many pesos Soros paid her. Not being wacist-she lives in Mexico.

http:// www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-news-kavanaugh-accuser-assault-school-20180919-story.html

>>3091878

I watched it live, but damn anon, you are right. It does need to be seen (again). Though I struggled with whom to believe, the fact is the allegations were never proven and were a she said, he said affair….like the Kavanaugh allegations thus far. The burden of proof lies with the accuser, and if there is no proof, the allegations should not be permitted to destroy a person.

That said I also now see a pattern. I agree with Justice Thomas' belief that it was a designed hit, and both cases are against conservatives seeking office that the political left (and the cabal) feels threatened by.

The court of public opinion should not substitute for a court of law, especially in a country founded on being 'a nation of laws rather than a nation men.'