Anonymous ID: d30c64 Sept. 19, 2018, 9:16 p.m. No.3099094   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3098824

Hmmmm, your argument is full on insults, you must really know what you are talking about.

 

I can't believe that your first and only post is to insult me for watching out for stuff we don't allow on this board for good reasons. Could you be a Clownfaggot/Mossad shill posse with six screens looking at our board, posting garbage to make the anons look bad?

Anonymous ID: d30c64 Sept. 19, 2018, 9:28 p.m. No.3099251   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3099200

Yes, how could anybody have a theory that differs from yours. Clearly if the footage we've seen was in fact faked, they must have really done it and just given us fake footage.

 

An no other scenario could possibly exist, unless you are an idiot.

Anonymous ID: d30c64 Sept. 19, 2018, 9:39 p.m. No.3099452   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3099396

Look, another single poster in favor of CP. Yes, a chick grabbing her cheeks to spread them is designed to appeal to a prurient interest. You do not have to have naked people for it to be porn. And since you think it's OK to fap to pictures of kids who are wearing cloths. I am guessing you are another clownfaggot