>Public is not ready for the truth
looks like ANON is not ready for the truth…
Expand your thinking.
(I heard that somewhere before)
I remember seeing a conspiracy 'film roll' of monolithic construction (a stonehenge sort of building) on the moon. Very old filmstrip, no audio, seemed authentic but what do I know about film?!?!
Could the misinformation about the moon be to cover up the odd things that were found there?
Would be possible to twist that theory into realm of possibility, however Q has used the word Missile and Missle before, actually often.
So I have to assume he would know there is a difference..
>How far away is the closest star?
>>4.3 light years
Wrong…
8 light minutes away.
And even if it was 4.3 light years away, at the speed of gravity (gravity propulsion) it would be feasible to traverse in less than an hour.
So the distance argument is moot.
I think Q was saying "we are inhabited" by aliens in this solar system… (here. Now..)
Watch video re: Golden Age of Saturn for load of info… It's called "Symbols of an alien sky"
Saturn is a recently dead star. (recently being ancient but it still glows).
Our sun is the closest star.
(whats up with the solar observatory?!?!)
Gravity has no aberration.
once you understand why, it self explains.
10^24 times faster propagation than light.
And I want to remind you that Einstein was Rothschild science, and columbia university used a RADIO telescope to measure refractions of radio signals to conclude that gravity travels slightly slower than light.
(akin to testing the propagation of heat by watching the refractions from a hot car hood.)
>because its not a ray/photon retard
>gravity is a force
Gravity is pressure…
Exerted in all directions, and a LACK therof (caused by absorbing into a massive object) will result in a difference that results in pressure.
Controlling/blocking the pressure in a direction will result in control.
Use your brain if you are considering yourself open minded and autist.
And try to lay off the insults, it makes you look retarded once others understand the concept.
You already know that mainstream science is fuckery, whats so hard about it?
Im still waiting on your explanation of why gravity has no aberration…
Brainwashed "official" science guppy.
ONCE AGAIN…
Where is the lack of aberration explained?
Once you get over that little hurdle I can continue…
>an aberration is a deviation of a ray from the behavior predicted by the simplified rules of geometric optics
>gravity is not a ray, therefore it doesn't have an abberation
LIGHT, SOUND, and even electrons are subject to aberration.
sound is not a ray either.
So please continue to explain and quote your science sources…
Ok.
Assume gravity travels at light speed.
Why does the sun wobble align with the earths position in real time, and NOT where it WAS 8mins ago?
Ray or wave, or whatever you consider the force to be. It makes no sense that this is possible unless gravity travels HELLA faster than light.
Not trying to be an asshole. Just observing where science is lying to us. And you are buying ito it…
You lost me there anon…
My point eventually was to explain gravity propulsion and how a small craft can traverse light years in only hours. But without gravity that just wont work, also my drink would need a lid!
-kek