>>3099485
pic related.
Note the wings. They're usually powered by jet engines. You've got jet engines and wings. Almost all cruise missiles are technically planes.
>>3099485
pic related.
Note the wings. They're usually powered by jet engines. You've got jet engines and wings. Almost all cruise missiles are technically planes.
I was gonna say paint chips.
Did you fall on your head as a child?
I have an idea. Learn to think better and then you don't need other people to think for you so you don't get confused. Understand the meaning of what was said and not what you want it to be.
hahaโฆ..you have to pick the one that says 'noun'.
No, I got bored and decided to ignore you. Everyone else is providing tons of evidence for you. I suggest you read.
Do you even internet?
>1.) We landed on the moon long before the Apollo missions.
Thank you. I can't blame people for not believing this - it takes a lot of research in a lot of different areas to put the pieces together.
SUPREME KEK
Tell me about it. I'm waiting for a declassification so I can start making flying cars. :-)
herein lies the advantage of the cabal.
Agree. Industry is fucked. It is often more instructive to go back 50 years and ignore recent 'technology' in order to determine what is actually possible.
single biggest piece, yes. but don't forget the education system, the university system, the research grant systems, etc., etc.
The entire field of IT shouldn't exist.
Guess what fag? He's not me.
>is Earth hollow?
It depends on how big of a cavern you're talking about being the 'inside' of the planet. If it is, say, the size of a car, then yes, the Earth is hollow. There are tons of caves and caverns in the Earth.
You're implying that the middle of the Earth is hollow, which is incredibly ignorant.
>A bit of a stretch, don't you think?
Nope. The only reason the field of IT exists is because the platforms and systems we've built require so much configuration. It is basically an extension of really poorly designed 60's technology. If someone with half a brain designed the systems we use, it would all be truly plug-and-play and 'normal' people would be able to easily configure their systems without the help of an IT person.
Q likely has reasons for this. Turned this place into a shit-show. Also derailed the shill behavior completely. my favorite theory is that it sweetened the honeypot and gave Q new ways to track bad guys here.
>job specialization
Just IT - job specialization is natural and beneficial (in general.) IT is just the result of a really shitty foundation underlying the entire tech industry.
I could go off about the software industry and the computing hardware industry as well, but they have separate problems. IT is the frosting on that cake.
Yes. I think Q will return and reference this Q&A session with some incredibly well thought out words of wisdom to humble the masses.
โฆor something.
From Herman Cain, no less!
>Unfortunately the software and hardware industry problems drive almost all the need for IT, imo.
Thusโฆif you were to eliminate the problems in the hardware and software industriesโฆ.the entire field of IT would not be necessary. It would not exist. See my logic?
Nah. Most of the edge-jumpers have been lurnt pretty well now - they've backed off. By tomorrow, the normies will understand the best interpretations of Q's comments. Of course, there will always be those who refuse to see Q's comments for what they are, but โฆ oh well. You can't save everyone from themselves.