Look this isn't rocket science.

Why would you fake plane crashes when there are thousands of jihadis willing to plan them for you?

The intelligence community depends on a complex web of comms to effectively communicate. One piece goes wrong and you have a terrorr attack.

If you wanted to cause an attack and you are stopping attacks all the time, would you plan it to a T, or just open a crack in the wall.

Plausible deniability?

It's all in the official report if you read between the lines Gentlemen.

>>3106016

Ok so I lied. this part is kind of rocket science.

"Combustion temperature" is kind of a farse, and in reality there was a lot more burning than jet fuel.

For example wood burns at about 600 degres C, but forest fires gan reach up to 1200 degrees C

Sauce = https://nhmu.utah.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/Wildfire%20FAQs.pdf

Think about a forge for example. Heat containment and airflow make a big difference.

Actually jet fuel exceeds the melting point of steel during combustion in a jet engine, as counterintuitive as it may seem. Advanced cooling techniques are required to keep the metal parts from melting.

Sauce = https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/ww2/projects/jet-airplanes/how.html

Cheers.

>>3106393

There is a theoretical max if you exclude thermodynamic effects, but this is very high. Definattely high enough to melt steel, although the max temps would never be reached in reality.

Sauce = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_flame_temperature