>Even better would be a Drone but not sure if those existed
Predator drone around since 1995.
>Airliners can achieve high subsonic speeds and are fairly maneuverable. The bolts on the engine pylons shear off on impact with the ground and the plane disintegrates on impact as it is largely aluminum composite sheeting. The fuselage acts as a ablative penetrator - jabbing with a rolled up sheet of paper, in a sense.
But the wings are the strongest structural elements of a commercial airliner. They would not fold immediately on impact? I'll agree that the punch-through hole fits the bill of a commercial airliner, and I agree that there seems to be evidence of something smashing into the sides of the non-collapsed walls in this pic (i.e. you can see the brick work pushed in further than normal around the punch through hole).
Now, it also makes sense that they would use a real airliner so as not to tip off the military that it was more than just arabs with box cutters.
If the trip code were compromised CM and BO would have confirmed by now.
And we would have messages on /patriotsfight/ confirming and updating trips.
Sure, but that didn't pulverize concrete and leave pools of molten lava under the WTC.
I'll believe they hit the Pentagon with an airliner and that the wings folded back upon impact. But two airplanes hitting the WTC, did not cause them to fall at free fall speed.
I'm more of the idea they mirconuked the basement of the towers and kept the military away from the crime scene.