>>3102455

I the beginning of Q there was something about there will be some that cannot accept kind of thing, as I recall. I think we have hit that point - as it appears that about 30-40 percent of anons that had their deeply held beliefs challenged last night either are actively balking or changing the narrative to disinfo or using some other mechanism to mentally deal with answers they cannot accept from a 'leader' they have devoutly followed.

>>3102510

>>3102530

As I recall with most of the drops Q made before last night anons would run out and research. The drops last night anons didn't go research they threw up their own walls in one way or another. Interesting.

>>3102573

I not disagree,

but

The particle view is about the only way they can research or even fathom the wave function. And if you ask about the geometry of the situation they get really triggered and will not answer. Study the proton at -

https://physics.stackexchange.com/

>>3102587

Q did tell us in the beginning it would be our choice what we could accept.

Anons confirming the statement.