Anonymous ID: 93ff94 Sept. 20, 2018, 3:49 a.m. No.3102240   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2248

>>3101851

What if the moon landings actually WERE real, anon?

 

Seriously, you conspiracy nut fucktards who think EVERYTHING we know is a lie? Y'all need to just fuck off already… you discredit legitimate conspiracy hounds.

Anonymous ID: 93ff94 Sept. 20, 2018, 3:56 a.m. No.3102285   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3101916

"I CAN'T BELIEVE Q WANTS US TO BELIEVE IN SOMETHING FOR WHICH THERE IS VERY LITTLE EVIDENCE, BUT IS SCIENTIFICALLY POSSIBLE! HOW COULD HE BE SO UNCRITICAL IN HIS THINKING!"

 

Same anon:

"The earth is flat contrary to all available evidence and logic, and god exists contrary to all available evidence and logic."

 

Fuck off, retard.

Anonymous ID: 93ff94 Sept. 20, 2018, 4:08 a.m. No.3102359   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2403 >>2491

Just gotta break down the whole "are we alone in the universe" question and answer.

 

The answer may SEEM to be ambiguous, able to be interpreted a few different ways depending entirely on what you WANT to be true.

 

However, that doesn't pass the logic test.

 

"Are we alone? Roswell?"

 

The answer:

>No.

>Highest classification.

>Consider the vastness of space.

>Q

 

No, we are not alone.

Consider the vastness of space.

 

Had he only said these two lines above in red, then the answer would have been ambiguous. It would have been a logical statement basically saying "Of course we're not alone IN THE UNIVERSE, because consider just how big it is, and how many other life-sustainable planets there must be. It's a statistical impossibility for us to be the only intelligent life in the universe."

 

But no! He had to also include the words "Highest Classification".

 

This means there has been alien visits HERE, and that it's been covered up. I suspect that he may even be alluding to a classification level that is so secret, even the existence of that classification level is classified.