>>3094453 (pb Q)
>>>3093917 (pb)
Apologies if covered, but I'm still trying to get this one straight.
>Due to K confirmation push.
It seemed clear before moving the date that the Test was linked to K confirmation hearing, ditto now with the later date. So is this because (a) unrest is expected once K is confirmed?
Or because (b) the Declas material will not actually be made public until after the confirmation?
If (b) just how explosive is this declas? Yes, OF COURSE, we've been digging on it forever, and we're pretty sure we know what it says, but . . . riots? Am I on the wrong track here?
Also, if (b) is the idea that they don't want to throw grenades that would affect senators (and the Declas should) until this vote is done?
>Hand in hand.
>[RR] stand down due to K conf.
Define stand down in this context?
Maybe I'm being dense, but why is [RR] linked to K confirm? I thought his [] was b/c of declas and conflicts. I'm stuck on the downstreams of K joining the court beyond the obvious balance of justices. What are the immediate ramifications for Red October?