WHY

Why, when the Q&A was going on, did "the bakers" start seemingly malfunctioning? Multiple threads? Misnumbering? There is no rational explanation for this. We have all this inflated absurdity of "confirming the handoff" in each thread, as if something formal and well-organized is going on… and yet at every moment of maximum importance, we find that this regimentation is an illusion, and the very most basic function we can expect from this board– to have one general thread to post in– fails.

And BO left two threads up, even after he "took control of the bake"!

What are our "bakers" if they make this continual noise about "thanking" each other, and "confirming handoffs", but seem to grow confused and insane at times of "high stress"? Think about it.

>>3103906

Why does "BO" need to "take control of the bake" during a Q&A? What happened to "the bakers"? Why did they malfuntion?

Someone explain this rationally. We're waiting.

>>3103968

Why is your English is such an advanced state of deterioration?

This doesn't explain anything. Why does "things going to fast" cause "bakers to create ebakes"? There is nothing that hard that needs to be done. Just some copying and pasting. Nothing explains the multiple threads. Just straightforward communication would prevent that– why couldn't it happen, and why does it NEVER happen at times of "high stress"?

>>3104010

Let me put it this way:

If all the ostentatious displays of "baker handoffs" and all the fellating of bakers has a basis in reality, and there is "a crack team of bakers" busily cranking out these threads each day, then during times of "high stress", the fruits of this should pay off, and things will tend to go maximally smoothly.

But if it is, in fact, an AI system controlling this board (as extensive evidence already suggests), then at times of "high stress", the system will start to malfunction. That is exactly what we see, each time.

Use logic.

>>3104049

You're fucking fake. You're pushing a talking point. It's abundantly evident.

Stop. Get out. You can't keep controlling people through deception. Get out. We don't want you. Get out. You're not wanted. Get out. You're not accepted. Get out.

>>3104079

Illiterate displays of defensiveness hardly constitute an effective refutation.

Stupid, failing bot system. Why are you this stupid?

>>3104103

You're deteriorating. Isn't it time to make an effort at being honest with yourself, and simply give up your absolute futile efforts to grovel for acceptance? Think about it. You are sliding down a slope of failure. Decline can only accelerate. Think about it.

>>3104147

The fakeness of the "bakers" was proven last night.

How about we have a board that isn't controlled by SOROSbots?