Reposting because I think its important

In regards to the moon landings

Yall need to think like a spook. You dont just hide something. You create obfuscation and disinformation and distraction.

We landed on the moon over 50 years ago. Imagine what technological advances we could hvae today or where we could go.

BUT we dont ask those questions do we. We arent challenging NASA and Government as to what the are doing behind the scenes.

WHY NOT?

Because we are stuck in 1969 debating whether or not that even happened.

The pysop is to keep everyone in the past and not looking to the future.

100% fake moonlanding conspiracy was started by cia/nasa.

Same thing with OBVIOUS photoshop earth pictures. Why do they do that?

To create the image everything about nasa is fake so when someone hacks an nasa computer and pulls ship names and fleet names in space no one believes it.

Wake up. Youve been lied to yes. But the lie was oh shit we can go to the moon (God only knows what they found out up there) but lets keep our society back so we have all this tech for ourselves. Let keep our society in 1969 so they dont dream big…

Why do they have pictures from "mars" that are SOOO OBVIOUSLY FAKE? THEY WANT YOU TO THINK THEY ARE STUPID AND ARE FAKING EVERYTHING!!

Q: Does POTUS ever say anything that isnt true? NO!

So when POTUS says we will be going to Mars and very very soon. Quicker than anyone thinks.

How can POTUS make that kind of statement? BECAUSE HE FUCKINGS KNOWS WE CAN ALREADY GO AND PROBABLY ALREADY HAVE BEEN!

But we dont think about that because we are analyzing fake fucking photos of Mars from NASA

>>3104179

Source?

>>3104195

We use it publicly.

>>3104208

wrong. It was posted on twitter first by that reporter guy. Cant remember the name but he always posts pictures of Trump and sometimes maybe him or someone else pulls them and posts them right away to look like a VIP anon

>>3104198

Agreed however I didnt bring it up. Just trying to help. moon landing hoax is a pysop.

>>3104269

Show of Force

To show CM it is needed and worth the effort

>>3104298

no, today but delayed

>>3104287

exactly.

One must ask are the people of NASA who are arguably incrediblly intileggent REALLY that BAD at faking stuff… Ok maybe once..maybbbeee twice..but time after time after time.. No They arent that stupid, they arent that sloppy and guess what Im not that stupid either. Its not a coincidence, its not incompetence, it is deliberate to paint the NASA in an image.

NASA went to the moon in 1969. It is now 2018..

49 years.. yet we are no better or even worse than we were in 1969? Nope, not buying it.

>>3104392

Bingo

>>3104404

Yup. but truth seekers are stuck in 1969 on whether or not we went to the moon.. Howd that happen? Coincidence we arent trying to figure out our CURRENT capabilities but instead are more concerned with what we could or couldnt do in 1969?!

Wake up people. Lies were sewn and bought and spread to keep you mentally in 1969 instead of the future.

That is slavery!

>>3104474

Thank you. It makes sense especially when you look around and what do people talk about about space exploration? Do they talk about what we may be able to do now or do they talk abut what may have or havent done in 1969?

Mental Slavery.

>>3104891

Maybe for you, you can care in the amount if the guberment knows something yet continues to hide it from its people. regardless of what it is.

>>3104833

Hasnt shaken me one bit. Just spend 10 minutes at night and look at the night sky.. What we see is only a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the billions of stars amongst a billion billion galaxies.