Anonymous ID: 914611 Sept. 20, 2018, 8:07 a.m. No.3104493   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3104383

I agree with that too.

We MUST do OUR part.

It is OUR responsibility in the first place. WE should never have let this problem go on so long without forcing the issue. I know some have and are working on it, but not enough of us helped out. This country should have stopped and demanded truth from day one and not moved an inch (no work, no shipping, no farming nada) until we got itโ€ฆ..and we didn't.

Anonymous ID: 914611 Sept. 20, 2018, 8:12 a.m. No.3104578   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4602

>>3104517

You can't ask a question that forces the answer to provide evidence for a conclusion you have already conceived.

You must ask questions that provide evidence to the correct conclusion, whatever that conclusion is and accept that answer as truth.

Anonymous ID: 914611 Sept. 20, 2018, 8:16 a.m. No.3104628   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4646

>>3104602

Then it is illogical to ask the question in this instance.

Take your evidence and your answers that you already know to some public forum and prove to others you are correct.

I'll watch CSPAN with baited breath awaiting your testimony to the full house and senate.

Anonymous ID: 914611 Sept. 20, 2018, 8:30 a.m. No.3104802   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Who does apple think they are?

who cares is apple 'trusts' anyone?

who cares what apple's opinion is?

why would apple be allowed to monitor?

since when does manufacture of contraptions give the manufacturer of said contraption control of its users?