>>3104292 (PB)

There is an implied previous conversation / plan. Q was simply announcing that targets had either been met or were nearing that point (saturation of the server ability to respond?) and it was time to ratchet ahead with the previous decisions -- whatever they were.

>>3105384 (PB)

Not an acceptable excuse. If she can get hold of Grassley's staff for this purpose, she can indicate intent to testify.