>>3106558

one can hope!

>>3106584

>>3106752

it burns too dirty anyway anon.

try about 20 rds and see…

>>3106837

well, if you guys are sitting on a bench hitting 'send', then it's twitter algorithm lag?

>>3106858

we are the Apocalypse

>>3107042

internet was why.

TMI and could not control info flow as before with only radio/tv/paper media.