Q, how are we supposed to continue redpilling people when after the stress test yesterday you are associated with vague claims of ET? Are there plans to elaborate on this? Those claims test your credibility even amongst anons, let alone normies who will discover you when things go public… (I still believe in you, just hard to explain to normies..)
Those goals are not mutually exclusive. Proving Q's credibility proves his claims and crumbs. (which relate to the things you mentioned) Without Q we can scream all day that people in our government are satanist pedovores, and people will just laugh and call it a conspiracy.
Not at all and I don't think he's lying. The timing of answering that particular question. (amidst all the questions that went out yesterday) is what I am questioning.
That's exactly why I'm curious if he is going to elaborate somewhat on the very vague bits of information he put out yesterday…
I never claimed that his claim was wrong, just how are we supposed to make people swallow that without supporting evidence apart from it's improbable that there -isnt- life out there? It would make sense to destroy all the satanists and evil people and -then- move onto disclosures like that.
Slap the dick out of your mouth and actually read. I never said the info is wrong or challenged it. I said it's hard to keep redpilling people when they stumble across that particular crumb.
Can you even read faggot? I didn't say he was wrong. I literally say in the last line that I believe in him. The claim that there are ET's is not extraordinarily out of reason. It's the timing in relevancy to the movie. He could have answered any other question.
Curious bit of disinfo…usually you can tell what's there to make the cabal stumble. Who's the target?
Best idea so far.