Attorney General Jeff Sessions:
If you want more death, 'listen to the ACLU, Antifa, Black Lives Matter'
BOMBSHELL:
Comey’s FBI said to have kept TWO sets of records regarding ‘Spygate’ operation
https://thenationalsentinel.com/2018/09/20/bombshell-comeys-fbi-kept-two-sets-of-records-regarding-spygate-operation/
WHO IS YOU?
From his Congressional testimony on May 23, 2017, Brennan said:
“Through the so-called Gang-of-Eight process, we kept congress apprised of these issues as we identified them. Again, in consultation with the White House, I personally briefed the full details of our understanding of Russian attempts to interfere in the election to congressional leadership.
“Specifically, Senators Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein, and Richard Burr, and to representatives Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Devin Nunes, and Adam Schiff between 11th August and 6th September [2016], I provided the same briefing to each of the Gang of Eight members.”
A question to be asked: why did Brennan brief each Gang of Eight member separately—and over a span of three weeks? Perhaps it was nothing more than scheduling conflicts. Brennan appears to go out of his way to note that he provided the same briefing to each member.
But if this was so, why would there be a particular concern over this information being given to the White House or any of the President’s attorneys. It seems an odd point to be demanding privacy assurances nearly two years later.
As long as all the information transmitted by Brennan was the same for each Go8 member…
Meanwhile, those being addressed by the letter continue to shift:
“On July 12, 2018, we also wrote to Director Coats to express alarm that this information was being made more broadly available within the Congress, in direct contravention of your assurances. In this letter, we noted that during our meetings with all of you on these sensitive matters we discussed at great length the importance of protecting sources and methods and ongoing investigations. As you recall, all of the meetings’ attendees agreed that the information discussed was among the most sensitive type of information and should be protected accordingly.”
Notice what was actually said and who was addressed. First comes an indirect reference to DNI Coats; “We also wrote to Director Coats.” Then the shift back to a direct address: “in direct contravention of your assurances.”
This could be understood as a shift back to all three individuals.
But then comes the distinction: “during our meetings with all of you.” And then back to “as you recall.” Who is “you?”
My money is on Rosenstein. But Wray appears to be a near equal candidate. Both are possible.
I would like to know, how many Anons understand that we are BAIT.. whole time