>It's perfect. Plausible deniability to the world yet ultimate confirmation to us.
Just what is so valuable about "plausible deniability" anyway? This is a huge effort to convince anons Q is working with Trump, but also allow Trump to deny involvement. What benefit is that?
Why doesn't Q set up his own image board running on his own hardware with his unlimited military budget? We're at the point where we'll follow Q where he goes. Why does a military op have to rely on a private citizen's goodwill?
News without source is fanfiction.
It belong to Ron. We're Ron's guests. He can take his ball and go home whenever he wants. Q says patriots are in FULL CONTROL. This website is one critical part of the plan that they do not actually control.
It's only beneficial if Q or POTUS wishes to do something outside the bounds of the law. I do not believe they wish to do so. If everything is on the level, there is no NEED for plausible deniability.
I understand the TEMPORARY need for distance, but there is no reasonable use for plausible deniability at the end. Unless our government deems it necessary to hide something from the governed forever. And then we're back to where we started again, being ruled over.
So "Full control" is the opposite of full control. Makes perfect sense anon.