Anonymous ID: f43ab3 Sept. 20, 2018, 11:41 a.m. No.3107882   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7893 >>7919 >>7923 >>7932

>>3106697

Can someone please explain how/why this is a Q proof?

 

In the old days, the Q proofs used to be that POTUS and Q would use the same word or letters between the Q post and the POTUS tweet. Now, it seems like we’re “proving” Q based on simply a timing of seemingly unrelated post contents.

Anonymous ID: f43ab3 Sept. 20, 2018, 11:43 a.m. No.3107914   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3107893

Right, I’m not discounting the old proofs, but seems like we shouldn’t be proving Q based simply on coincidental timing of unrelated posts.