I'm pretty sure the "baby pepe" is specifically designed to infantilize and undermine. The fact that this meme is swarming with attention tends to confirm this, as usually this kind of activity is bots.
Do you all agree that infantilized pepe isn't a very good image to represent our mission here, in spite of the apparent "chan culture" significance you would appear to be trying to invoke? M
What sort of 'possibility' are you considering? What sorts are there, or might there be? How does free will infringe on possibility? How do the difficulties in conceptualizing free will bear on the question of divine omnipotence?
No answer. Unsurprising.
Once you realize that 90-95% of all posts here are fake, it becomes pretty easy to see all the fakery.
The media wants to infantilize us.
And our bots here work hard to do the same. Along with allllll the other undermining tactics they continually deploy.
Once any level of thought was required, it got stuck.
FYI
Symbols are symbols due to their form. Therefore, if the form is altered, the symbol is changed, and "Pepe isn't Pepe anymore". Can't you see how the potency of Kek doesn't inhere in infantile pepe? It's memetic warfare.