>>3112106 (pb)
are you implying you do?
Are you saying that the majority of the people in the military are actually intelligent and are well versed in our constitution and bill of rights?
It should be a requirement to anyone joining the military to know that document backwards and forwards. Is it a requirement?
Why not? Should it be? Why not?
more like to further track their own citizens in the coming global totalitarian police state which will arise in the wake of the global executions
any military fags here?
if so, what % of the military, would you say, are ardent patriots that are well versed in the constitution and bill of rights?
what % is there for the paycheck or citizenship?
Q is utter garbage.
Make no mistake, these cabal traitors WILL go down.
However, Q too has an agenda, and we are 100% being played.
Q is not Jesus. He is a dude being told what to write by his boss. Nothing more.
Really?
Any honest military fags here?
Can you confirm:
Majority of people in armed forces are "pretty well educated"
and
"are VERY WELL educated with the constitution".
I HIGHLY DOUBT THAT.
I've met plenty of military folk. I would not bet my life on a majority of them even knowing the year the constitution was ratified. would you?
sure, wouldn't want you to have to go to the hospital
the bigger the lie the more they fall for it
definitely not genius,
it was signaling the catch.
Yes, hildabeast et al will go down, but there will be a very big catch…
what good is swearing an oath to the constitution if most enlisted men have never read it or don't understand it?
it should be made a requirement that everyone 100% understands it. otherwise, what's the point of swearing allegiance to it?