Start from a point of agreement, and you'll have better success. Insulting them, as some of the memes do, is not going to work.
I'm watching a video of AS talking about the "Democrat response" to the memo. Disgusting.
> why is msm allowed to lie
I recall that there was a law passed some time ago that does not require news organizations to tell the truth. It became legal then for them to become propaganda organizations. I recall also that there was a law passed that allows people to lie to Congress. Maybe someone can cite those?
Apache is a layer of the the operating system of a great many web servers. It runs on Linux most often. I'm guessing that if you see Apache in connection with IBM, they're trying to find ways to defeat it. Apache is an open source program. I'm not sure this is the Apache that Q referred to, though. Apparently, Apache is also an oil company and a military helicopter.
>smith mundt act
That one goes back to 1948. The bills I was thinking of are more recent, sometime after 2000.
Big Pharma is busy taking out the homeopathic industry, most recently.
Just about all of them are ultimately in debt to the banking system.
One thing I know about IBM, though perhaps not Ms. James specifically, is that they were recipients of stolen technology. There were a lot of abuses of the patent system to make that happen. The story goes that developers of new tech would be watched until they were just about to release their work to market. Then the government would swoop in and confiscate it, supposedly for security reasons. And then they would pass the tech on to another company. IBM received some of these.
Either it's for internal use only or y'all need to find a way of using it that focuses on something that was done. Focus on deeds, not party.
Yes, that would be about the right timing.
Agreed. Find a point of commonality and work from there. Bring the DEEDS of those who threaten the common good into it. After all, we won't be prosecuting HRC for being HRC or a Democrat. We'll prosecute her for specific crimes that were committed.
Agnostics don't believe or disbelieve. They just don't have a basis for knowing. It's the atheists who are anti-God.
And why shouldn't they? Even Jesus agreed that we are gods. I think he was quoting Psalms when he said that.
โIs it not written in your law, โI said, โYou are godsโโ?โ (John 10:34) The continuation of the verse Jesus cited says, โAnd all of you are children of the Most High.โ (Psalm 82:6)
I even gave citations. It's right there, in the Bible. He even said that we would be able to do greater things than He did.
Yes, I understand the context. I also understand the greater context. Read this slowly and carefully:
โLet this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God.โ (Philippians 2:5โ6)