Anonymous ID: 556f33 Sept. 20, 2018, 11:02 p.m. No.3118592   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8633

>>3118573

ping is handled at the very lowest level of the network stack - pretty much immune to server load unless the tasker is extremely loaded (like hardware event saturation, which isn't normal.) Your test will only have any relevance with higher level packet types, like UDP or TCP.

Anonymous ID: 556f33 Sept. 20, 2018, 11:08 p.m. No.3118645   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8731

>>3118633

Yep. Ping delays are handled immediately before any other processing happens. That's one notch above arp traffic but way below everything else. Everything else is scheduled in user-land.

Anonymous ID: 556f33 Sept. 20, 2018, 11:17 p.m. No.3118734   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8925

>>3118695

While it is true that you can't know whether or not certain things are true if you don't have first-hand experience with them happening. However, if you consider several scenarios, you can determine which scenario is the most likely based on lots of things - just like investigators do. For example, if you have factions and evidence of motives and capabilities, you can determine (within margins of error) what the likelihood of each scenario is based on how likely all of these factors would make the behavior.

 

So from that standpoint for example, if I understand how advanced space travel works from a physics standpoint and I understand roughly when that tech would have been invented and I know who most likely would have been in control of those inventions, then I can see a very likely scenario that would explain WHY the moon landings would have been faked. (To cover that factions actual capabilities.)

 

Just an example.

Anonymous ID: 556f33 Sept. 20, 2018, 11:27 p.m. No.3118831   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8842

>>3118817

Why are you trying to convince people of this shit? Just let them read Q and come to their own conclusions.

 

I disagree with your assertions and I think you're a retard.