Board under attack.? Go a bunch of errors trying to get here
>>3118251 pb
They used explosives to modify the forensics afterward. Gash in the side of Pentagon was not that large initially. It was for optics.
There is photo evidence to this effect. Remember people have been studying this for many years already.
Sorry for the slide. I figured maybe the Streisand effect on this, because the answer led to increased interest.
Also, I'm assuming the ambivalent answer is to protect the vulnerable veterans , who need to be in denial until some fucks can be brought to justice.
They very reason some anons need to have "Q" tell them "what is" proves they haven't done their own work; and they need to rely on authority "the teacher"
Tht in itself is a lesson, people who studied it already know it wasn't a big Boeing.
Happy Equinox. Autumn! 4th Quarter. buckle up.
It's important to distinguish between what you know because you yourself studied it and learned it /
from what you know because someone told you.
It's fine to get evidence from sources but you yourself are the ultimate source / eyewitness.