>>3122263 (lb) re: James Wood Twatter Ban
Won't Twatter's "text or imagery that has the potential to be misleading in a way that could impact an election" rule pretty much rule out ALL political speech?
I mean everyone is trying to get their ideas across to impact elections, right? If what you say is different from what I believe, I can say it's misleading - and you can say the same about me, or anyone else - effectively banning all but the most banal speech. . . .