Anonymous ID: 3ee7d0 Sept. 21, 2018, 1:08 p.m. No.3125371   🗄️.is 🔗kun

▶Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 09/21/18 (Fri) 14:42:41 No.280

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/21/us/politics/rod-rosenstein-wear-wire-25th-amendment.html

 

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1043206110105231361

 

Goodbye, Mr. Rosenstein.

 

Q

 

Sure. Get Trump over to Bethesda so he can be tossed out a window with a sheet tied around his neck like Adm. James Forrestal?

 

(Captcha hell + LAF) just now.

Anonymous ID: 3ee7d0 Sept. 21, 2018, 1:36 p.m. No.3125843   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3125735

That is a setting of priorities. In no case can DJT tell Sweden what to do. That is up to the Swedes. However, unfucking the US will be very helpful to you, too.

Anonymous ID: 3ee7d0 Sept. 21, 2018, 1:53 p.m. No.3126077   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6095

>>3125808

Whatever reason you choose will be a vast over-simplification.

Ask yourself what the economic ramifications of slavery are. Dig deep. The north was big into preventing the south from mechanizing. What effect did this have? The south was wanted as the low value source of raw materials for the northern industries. Coal. Cotton, iron ore, food, alcohol, leather and so on. (Dig "Whiskey rebellion").

The economic model was so lopsided that the south could never get out of debt. Never.

Note, too, that the Confederate Army was able to field a large number of free black soldiers during the war. If it was only about slavery, why would they take up arms on the side of the south?