Different take on "X-Factor" here…point will come, bear with me…

If Q's posts about LL are true and not disinfo, don't anons find it strange that she'd be singing, but not JC and AM? That JC and AM would be scheming with each other to get off (kek)? Why would they think they even stand a chance of getting off (inb4 "their egos")?

LL was their BOSS, right? Wouldn't it stand to reason that LL got into worse and deeper shit than them because she had more authority/power/control? Wouldn't it stand to reason that Jimmy and Andy would want to eagerly squeal on HER? On Hussein? On Brennan even? But it so seems they are mum.

What if Loretta wasn't as high and mighty as her AG role would suggest? What if the FBI boys somehow held more clout than her? Extra clout? From where?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_X_Factor

"The X Factor is a television music competition franchise created by British producer Simon Cowell and his company SYCOtv. It originated in the United Kingdom, where it was devised as a replacement for Pop Idol (2001–2003), and has been adapted in various countries."

So Q used the file name X-Factor.png on the post regarding Jimmy and Andy's latest shenanigans. Is that a hint the FBI boys are actually MI6 boys, shilling directly for ye olde crown and FVEY? The question's been asked before, but Q likely can't answer it outright. Not now anyway.

>TREASON AT HIGHEST LEVELS.

>FOREIGN AGENTS WITHIN OUR GOV'T.

>HIGHEST LEVELS.

And I doubt it's just the MB…

>>3133360

Agree, but I believe formal marriage is not necessarily a means to an end. People who are irresponsible/immature out of marriage will be irresponsible/immature in marriage. And kids just tend to amplify whatever dynamic is in play at the time.

Why can't people just be in love and monogamous? Have a traditional united dynamic without formal constraint…keeps everybody more honest. You tow the mark, or lose your partner. And no alimony safety nets for either gender. But then, no need for divorce, so less likelihood for cold feet and resentment? In turn encourages relationship growth? I understand non-marriage isn't acceptable to the religious and child custody could still be iffy if things get ugly, but is it worse than what we got?

The bottom line is, we need more secure, confident, self-sufficient whole people in the world, with morals and values they stick to, not necessarily in a religious sense, but just a non-hypocritical and sincere sense.

>>3133640