^(quick link from 'lag') ^
"future proves past"
"past is prologue"
Probably the most important thing stated:
=cool +(true)
Interesting… thought [RR] was closer to NYT link; maybe not. It is clear that the piece is manufactured; a compilation of feelings perceived or more likely, what one wants the reader to feel; just look at "lodestar." Dont believe it. Was looking at your drops and then targets; also, a senior official is not necessarily within the WH.
I feel though, that this line of inquiry will tangent; it is not useful, or at least, is not the most useful train of thought. Last link looked at:
https://www.wral.com/rosenstein-suggested-he-secretly-record-trump-and-discussed-25th-amendment/17863723/
what was "said", and what was "unsaid" are markers; I feel like you thought the message was explicit. Autist Anons noticed the [Deltas].
… "future proves past"
Network there, GW Patriots! The 'fall-out' makes sense.
…
Network
Web:
(>Spider?
WC/HRC>Comey@(lawfirm)
Comey<BM>RR
BM>RR+Comey
U1 ?
Signoffs?)
Counter:
(32536 locked on [U1]
Huber based where?
32536 HQ based where?
Distinctive 00A… fits what profile?
'What Mil_SigInt Team deploy units indepedently?')
Its all there told months ago, as the men on watchtowers saw it, and planned for it, and one gave the orders to the troops on the field.
How it happened was special; your curiosity and persistence drafted you.
_