Why John Mack matters to John Podesta.
Today, amid the lingering John Podesta UFO disclosure headlines, a friend asked me how I interpreted the last paragraph in the Vanity Fair, May 2013 article, “Alien Nation: Have Humans Been Abducted by Extraterrestrials?” which examines the work and legacy of John Mack. I’m sure many remember the end of the article: Roberta Colasanti, one of Mack’s research associates, said he communicated to her a cryptic message on the abductions they had been studying: “It’s not what we thought.” Colasanti waited breathlessly for the solution to the mystery, but it didn’t come. Mack promised to return with more information. So far he hasn’t. Reading the clever journalist’s dangling implication “It’s not what we thought” in the context of John Podesta’s disclosure regret, I want to share with you my response to my friend. Those who have read my previous John Mack blogs know that I deeply admire and respect him. And yet, I need to pull a thread from John’s work and weave it into what’s happening today related to John Podesta’s comment. There is an important tie. Many important ties.
Laurance Rockefeller is the weaver. John Podesta is a thread in the Rockefeller initiative that continues today. Yet, the most important thread in this unfolding extraterrestrial disclosure narrative is neither Rockefeller nor Podesta. As evolving Exoconscious people, the most important threads in disclosure are you and me. Let me explain through the response I emailed my friend. Here is my response.
Thank you for the article on John Mack and the highlight of the last paragraph. Also for your nod to John Podesta and disclosure. Roberta Colasanti was integral in John’s work. She was John’s clinical director. But, more on that later…
Let’s turn first to John Mack. There is a back story to John, as with all of us. Laurance Rockefeller funded John’s Institute and also funded his trial attorney, Daniel Sheehan, who successfully defended John in the Harvard lawsuit. Laurance Rockefeller’s primary partner in the Clinton disclosure initiative was Marie “Bootsie” Galbraith. Her husband was an Ambassador to France under Reagan, so you know they were a powerful couple. Furthermore, her husband, Evan Galbraith, was a member of the Yale Skull and Bones society. (Familiar government crowd) John was educated at the Boston Psychoanalytic Society Institute. The origins of the Institute began with Henry Murray, head of Harvard’s Psychology Clinic, who was part of the CIA MKULTRA program. (Here they are again) John Mack was also a Lawrence of Arabia scholar. Ironically, I believe he was attending a Lawrence of Arabia conference in London at the time of his death. Lawrence of Arabia is historically relevant today regarding the role he played in the British, now US control of the Middle East. The ramifications of his diplomacy actions linger. Lawrence of Arabia may also be connected to the Rockefellers. Lawrence of Arabia managed the Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Empire on behalf of the Arab Bureau of Britain’s Foreign Office. Other researchers linked Lawrence of Arabia to the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) which was the sister organization of the Rockefeller influenced Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). What are we to make of these threads that crisscross the career of John Mack: CIA, MKULTRA, Skull and Bones, Harvard, Yale, Rockefeller, CFR, RIIA? I’m not sure, other than the same players keep surfacing. As John Podesta does today with any mention of disclosure.
This is an article written by: Rebecca Hardcastle Wright, PhD
Founder, Institute for Exoconsciousness, Extraterrestrial UFO Consciousness Expert –Futurist, Speaker, Author, Coach (from her linkedin page)
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-john-mack-matters-podesta-rebecca-hardcastle-wright