Dated, but relevant to a bit of a dig I am going to launch into. A friend of mine is interested in immigrating from abroad, and the issue of public charge and bonds thereof have created quite a stir (the idea that someone needs to front at least $10k to enter the U.S. is understandably kind of "wtf")

But note the media buzzwords. It's "leaked" a "draft" of a "possible" executive order. Yet it is being circulated as if it is the current law along with stories of people being declined for not being able to prove they have large amounts of money in reserve.

Here is the cabal fuckery part… If the wall is built, then a means of entry is the diversity visa (green card lottery) program. By discouraging legitimate immigrants using 'leaks' and distortion, this frees up space for cabal fronts to slip in through the green card process.

By making it appear as if the rules have changed and that immigration to the U.S. is only for the wealthy, then the cabal groups have less competition in the lottery and review process.

Sauce:

https://www.migrationpolicy.org/news/leaked-draft-possible-trump-executive-order-public-benefits-would-spell-chilling-effects-legal

Dig direction will be in the range of who is proliferating the rumor that this is law, attempts to isolate specific cases of denial claims, and who leaked the memo. Assistance/additional info from Q and/or other anons would be appreciated.

>>3137791

It is really confusing for people who are entirely overseas. They aren't here on a work visa or … Just here… Government aid systems overseas are very different and the way these things are worded makes it sound like the average citizen who holds down a job is just not going to cut the mustard because everyone is on public healthcare except the mega-wealthy.

But this doesn't seem to be the case, as specifically U.S. systems of aid are mentioned in official policy documents. There is the requirement to be able to show you have some assets and employability so you aren't destined straight for section 8 housing or something - but that is very different from needing to front a bond on top of it.

Whoever is circulating this rumor wants control over the diversity visa process, it would seem, to make sure we get a lot of alohas at our snackbars, I would imagine.

>>3138148

Egypt>Persia>Rome>Ottoman>France>England>USA>China

Seems to be about the flow.