immigration to US should be primarily from european stock (plus russian and other parts of the world more aligned with us by blood).
No more than 200,000 a year, 90% of that from above category.
Nothing from the middle east.
hostile demographics and unnecessary excesses within asiatic (current census definition) population should be reduced by appropriate means, obviously no more foreign influx.
'legal' immigration is not a right.
Hungry and starving, trying to find any crumbs we can. We are done being cockroaches in a gold mine.
Hopefully our love for our children and loved ones will compel us to rid the evil that is preying on them (their minds above all).
>Think of the countries in the world that are really dark
central asia, with kazakhstans and all the 'stans' along that region + some african nations with similiar set up.
We know astana and such places seem strategically placed (good share of agricultural land + good portion being under 48th parallel = ideal and off the radar of most).
>The work to keep them dark is paid for by what is trafficked through those countries. What gets trafficked?
People. Organs. Drugs. Cash. Uranium/weapon grade materials of various types, natural resources (oil, rare earth) which ties into why china grabbed xinjiang to begin with.
As far as putin and sochi, I would think it is one of the oligrachs but I admit I have not dug into this angle too hard. We seem to be leaning towards torshin and good part of the bravta being against putin since they are under hostile player's thumbs.
Perhaps you mean the same forces that are against us helped putin to set up that event - no duality. Only power and energy.
One off hand question regarding the diets and meat: is it necessary to totally evade meat (even if free-range and grass/natural fed) aside from 'ceremonial' occasions? I know about 'sechita' and such practices, but I imagine that thoroughly exsanguiated and properly prepared material is necessary for consumption, nothing less.
I have not yet fully understood or dug into the 'cosmic wheel' angle yet, and am trying hard to keep a rational mindset and apply logic to its implications.
This may be jumping a bit ahead, but what are the consequences of hunting a free roaming herd member vs gaining meat via your own 'farm'? I would think the former is a more appropriate means of obtaining meat if necessary.
Being a relatively large and 'seeker' type, I do sometimes feel it is necessary to gain protein and other materials via this method. It really is a bit of a sticking point, and was wondering what the true options are.
Cellular capacity to have longevity sounds great - except I do not know what role meat plays in the whole picture.
OUR category, not yours.
'requirements' as they currently stand are largely inconsequential and many many people around the world can do the same jobs with greater degree of agreeability and effort if given the right 'nudge'.
You are correct it is OUR category. WE, the PEOPLE, decide what should be in our nations.
Not foreigners.
"False song of globalism…", be it appear 'red' or 'blue'.
Lies will die in darkness.