Make your own…
Blank included.
No one noticed ALPHABET INC sponsored his stupid BETO ass.
He's a fucking Clown, and Mossad Clown.
(takes it up the ass I bet, just like Obummer… )
>https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/summary?cid=N00033540
BETO With Soros and Clown and Mossad connections…
NOTABLE AS FUCK
True, didn't think we could get it in writing until after the election.
(or in his case the loss of the erection.)
-kek
the vegas shooting?
Einstein was a brownhole…
His mom & dad were cousins, he married his cuz too. SHE got the money for the theory in the divorce (as stated meaning she wrote it).
He was not a scientist, but a clerk.
A plagiarist and liberal lair.
The list is very long actually…
OH and if his theory was correct, then black holes can not exist.
(if light is the fastest thing in space, why does it not have escape velocity enough to get out of the black hole gravity?)
A. Because GRAVITY is faster. (and the Roths paid for this bullshit science to cover up the truth of gravity - not sure why but I am certain of the coverup.)
Thus "brown hole" is the most flattering award for Einstein that I can offer.
>Ken Wheeler
Never heard of ken, who is he?
I have hobbied with gravity sciences for decades, and have been intrigued why no official science explains it. If Ken has anything of interest I would like to read or watch…
Thx.
We should see a "blip" of light into the center if so, and the event horizon would be at the singularity not far around it.
A deep phase shift perhaps would be noted, but light is not present at all. In fact there is a halo of darkness at great distance (EH) from the singularity.
He's right - as shocking to science class as it is.
I (and no one else) can know the mass of the singularity in question, but (not sure why) everyone agrees that the EH and the surface of the singularity are very sparse.
IF this is the case (and it supposedly is) then my point is that where light turns around and heads into the singularity instead of exiting, is the point where it proves gravity is dragging the light in, meaning the gravity must be propagating faster than the light to have such an effect.
Lensing effects would still apply in this theory, light is bending but not reversing.
When I first started my research, Laplace was never admitted into Wiki, but I see it is there now, I will paste from wiki a section:
(the theory I am trying to explain)
The first attempt to combine a finite gravitational speed with Newton's theory was made by Laplace in 1805. Based on Newton's force law he considered a model in which the gravitational field is defined as a radiation field or fluid. Changes in the motion of the attracting body are transmitted by some sort of waves.[5] Therefore, the movements of the celestial bodies should be modified in the order v/c, where v is the relative speed between the bodies and c is the speed of gravity. The effect of a finite speed of gravity goes to zero as c goes to infinity, but not as 1/c2 as it does in modern theories. This led Laplace to conclude that the speed of gravitational interactions is at least 7×10^6 times the speed of light.
Keks, Autism, and Stupidy are the steering wheel for subject matter here!
(it is brilliant)
If you are elected to office by the great American people, and you swear into office to uphold the constitution…
And you are a Socialist, Commie, or anything except Capitolist, ARE YOU TREASONOUS?
Can we hang BETO and the others if they win?
Q??
Chime in and say hell yea…