Anonymous ID: 553b6d Sept. 22, 2018, 8:02 p.m. No.3146391   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6462 >>6505 >>6522

>>3146213 (lb)

>gravity is an inward attractive force,

This is the "observable effect", but not necessarily the nature of the mechanism of which gravity works. (bear with me here)

 

I have to type a long post that will explain it even to science minded persons but will try to be very layman in the context because it really is that simple. This is a fringe theory that has been met with skeptics of mainstream science, but we know science has a deep state too.

And if you are familiar with the super kamiokande experiment in japan, testing deep underground in the daytime (to measure solar neutrinos) they found that "almost" as many were encountered at night with the sun on opposite side of planet. (the experiment was sabotaged - wonder why…)

Only conclusion is these things (whatever you want to call em) passed nearly unblocked thru the planet. They have a little tiny bit of mass also. Very fast, coming from all directions nearly equally. Very few of them being absorbed by the mass of the planet (or any other mass)

 

This is easier to picture if you consider the earth as a slightly tinted crystal ball. With light hitting it equally on all its surface area. (perfect scenario here). There will be a slight shadow at the surface because some light did not make it all the way thru. Imagine standing on such a surface whereas more light hits your head than the soles of your feet. (the light is gravity pushing more toward the surface because of the difference of more coming down than is leaving the surface upwards.)

Visualize the mechanism of gravity as that of the light.

"push effect" - but it appears to "attract".

All of newtons science is exact and still applies.

 

Give it a few moments of thoughts and apply what you know about orbits and everything- it still applies in every cosmic interaction…

 

But it also means that if you can manipulate gravity you can create propulsion. (this is the reason I think it is hidden and obscured).

[I hope i explain it well enough and simple enough to visualize & apply to cosmos]

 

Before you slap the theory as retarded, (I did for years after I first heard it) but first seriously understand at least the mechanics of what it implies.

 

My daughter works @ NASA and I have spent a few evenings with her and her nerdy friends, this theory was first discussed (to me) years ago over a weekend grill party in League City when I asked them to try to blow my mind with science shit.

Anonymous ID: 553b6d Sept. 22, 2018, 8:13 p.m. No.3146518   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6554

>>3146462

I think some people (Edward Leedskalinin -if spelled right, and John Huchinson) have manipulated it , knowingly or unknowingly.

Neither of those people were schooled in science norms, perhaps why they could think "outside the box".

 

It is fascinating. If I ever retire, that is what I want to learn about and experiment with. Who knows! Perhaps Q will help me out with some crucial info for my birthday…

Anonymous ID: 553b6d Sept. 22, 2018, 8:16 p.m. No.3146560   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6646

>>3146522

If i was not so damn old, I would be already applying for SpaceForce.

And I have to wonder if F16 (like Q admitted) can intercept ICBM's (badass shit right!) .

Why not fit a jet with a special engine on a gimbal and seal up the cockpit. Making a temporary spacecraft suited for blowing shit up in near space…

Sounds cool Probably got much better!!

Anonymous ID: 553b6d Sept. 22, 2018, 8:23 p.m. No.3146630   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6641

>>3146604

he never admitted any attack, it makes the enemy seem valid to even talk about it. He has suffered nearly a dozen assassination attempts that we know about so far. Some have video evidence. Q admitted others.

Anonymous ID: 553b6d Sept. 22, 2018, 8:42 p.m. No.3146802   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6864

>>3146785

Ok, perhaps racist (it is actually) but a friend of mine calls them "Niglets"

And i fucking kek every time, he is a oil field worker and bigger than a double fridge, redneck as fuck! Classic Texas shit…