Anonymous ID: 9940cc Sept. 22, 2018, 11:31 p.m. No.3148180   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3148140

I believe it was "read for content". Do you realize when you "cage" your sarcasm, it just may be interpreted as something other than sarcasm?

Anonymous ID: 9940cc Sept. 22, 2018, 11:45 p.m. No.3148267   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8270

>>3148246

I agree…..but honestly, cuz of all the time she's on Fox, I thought she had her own show…:) ..I think the reason Fox is hesitating is, with those fabulous breasts, nobody would be interested in the brilliant things she has to say.

Anonymous ID: 9940cc Sept. 22, 2018, 11:52 p.m. No.3148291   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3148261

Why would she want someone else reporting the great things she has dug up through true journalism? She can have a 1 hour show per week and report all the things she's dug up. Why give that to some talking head actor?

Anonymous ID: 9940cc Sept. 23, 2018, 12:16 a.m. No.3148448   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8475

>>3148421

Well, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that when you say "thick girls", you're not talking about fat girls. Too many drunken nights I ended up with fat girls and we both asked the same question, simultaneously…"Is it in yet?"

Anonymous ID: 9940cc Sept. 23, 2018, 12:29 a.m. No.3148523   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3148475

Oh, I sound like I'm complaining but the "foreplay" with those fine woman of exceptional girth was phenomenal; the things they were willing to do, whew….made it easy to tolerate the inevitable consummation. If it wasn't a win-win, it was at least a draw and both walked away semi-satisfied.