Just had a thought: what if the reason POTUS decided to allow for some retractions on the FISA release is related to the Brexit negotiatons?

We know the Brits expressed concern over their release, which has had every Conservative pundit asking what concern it is of theirs. We also read that Theresa May seems to have developed some new resolve for Brexit, without seeking a second referendum. Maybe POTUS is holding the redactions over her head, with a threat of removing them if she doesn't follow through?

If those docs show that GB colluded with HRC and others to undermine our democracy, what might the British think? How scandalous might the documents be? Evidence of her selling GB out to Merkel, Macron, Soros and co.?

Just something to consider. POTUS understands leverage and the "Art of the Deal." He's working China like a pimp works a crack-fiending ho. No reason to believe he'll treat the other bad actors any better.

Besides, UK has featured prominently in Q's flowcharts recently. Maybe we should reexamine through that lens.

>>3148639

Are you speaking of the virtual quantum computer? You may be speaking to its creator. You should do some quick research on the relationship of large primes to encryption, then look up quantum computers and their potential to break that encryption, then head to /vqc and see CrisRootoDavid's description of how Schrodinger's wave equation can be described by computers.

Einstein might have said that simple explanations indicate mastery, but few people understand general relativity still. It requires effort on the part of the reader; he can't just grant you intelligence.

Chris, if you're around, this is PrimeAnon. Just started a new semester, but I will be back.

>>3148801

Sometimes I can understand why the cabal laughs at us. By ensuring that only the stupidest among us (ie Liberals) have a voice, they've fostered a culture where videos like these are 'brave' and videos of men behaving normally are dangerous.