>>3148238 (last)
How is it a loophole? A relative of a prosecutor is immune from investigation? Don't they have recusal rules about that, so that young Brett could have been investigated if young Christine had "come forward" with allegations?
This is absurd, they keep dreaming up (or already dreamed up and are now deploying) one "shadow of doubt" after another, but the doubt is by now so small with all 4 of her alleged witnesses denying it ever happened, that no more shadows should matter. She's discredited, goodbye.