Anonymous ID: 05511a Sept. 23, 2018, 11:33 a.m. No.3152643   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3207

>>3152542

And don't forget that McConnell is also turning up the heat, threatening / promising to keep Congress in session through October.

 

McConnell suggests he could hold Senate in session through October

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/407763-mcconnell-suggests-he-could-hold-senate-in-session-through-october

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) suggested Friday that he could keep lawmakers in Washington until the end of October if Democrats seek to slow or block the confirmation of President Trump's judicial nominees.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/11/senate-democrats-mcconnell-midterms-2018-815705

McConnell screws Dems ahead of election with October session: The majority leader wants to deprive Democrats up for reelection the chance to campaign.

 

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is planning to keep the chamber in session for a significant portion of October if not four entire weeks, costing Democrats key campaign trail days and allowing the Senate to continue its work into the fall, according to five Republican officials. The Kentucky Republican wants to keep cranking through as many lifetime judicial nominations and executive nominations as he can with his majority in the balance and the GOP still with the unilateral ability to confirm President Donald Trump’s picks.

Anonymous ID: 05511a Sept. 23, 2018, 12:03 p.m. No.3153061   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3152937

>House Resolution 347

 

18 U.S. Code § 1752 - Restricted building or grounds

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1752

 

(b) The punishment for a violation of subsection (a) is—

(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, if—

(A) the person, during and in relation to the offense, uses or carries a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm; or

(B) the offense results in significant bodily injury as defined by section 2118(e)(3); and

(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in any other case

 

Article explaining the changes:

 

On the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011

 

https://www.lawfareblog.com/federal-restricted-buildings-and-grounds-improvement-act-2011

 

FTA:

H.R. 347’s far more blogo-controversial innovation is this: the bill also would make it easier for a person to violate § 1752. Right now the statute applies to individuals who, among other things, “willfully and knowingly” cause disruptions in and around federal facilities, or other areas temporarily restricted because of official visits. H.R. 347 would drop “willfully” and leave “knowingly” as the lone mens rea requirement