>>374173

>[Q] THEN throws the Redpiller's under the bus

>"you must be an idiot and I cannot take anything you say seriously."

I think this is a necessary part of the long-game red-pilling. We plant a seed. We sound crazy for a little while. And then truth bombs are dropped to the general public, and some of our key claims get corroborated. So the people who dismissed us as crazy, then start wondering what else is out there that they've dismissed prematurely. And eventually, even with plausible deniability, Q & their disciples gain cred. Eventually, even though 60% will not be revealed to the public at large, Q will still reveal (already has revealed?) a lot more than 40% to us, and we'll have a much easier time to red-pill truth-seekers the rest of the way, b/c by then the'll already know that they don't know shit, and that they need us to guide them to the truth. In the grand scheme of things, it's certainly worth being dismissed as crazy for a couple of months.

>>374608

Even if the info comes out a week or 2 late, when it does, the fact that it was late wouldn't matter at all wrt harvesting the red-pill seeds. But if weeks go by and nothing happens, then it's legit to question the source. If most of the predictions are coming through, then dismissing it as 5% necessary disinfo is not unreasonable either. But that would still makes it less reliable for seeding red-pills.

>>374771

Couple of months applies to risking credibility & sounding crazy by referencing Q or Dilley type of sources. Without intel drops, red-pilling efforts will still alienate normies, and many would still write us off as crazy for years to come. So a few months doesn't seem so bad in that context. But I get what you're saying, and likewise am seeking vindication for years. And likewise I can't wait for things to finally happen to shred the leftovers of any doubt that justice will be served and that the cabal is on its death bed.