Henry Kissinger warns about dangerous AI.

Anyone who uses google can discover that some of our best computer scientists have been working on "friendly AI" for decades.

Henry suggests otherwise.

>"Philosophers and others in the field of the humanities who helped shape previous concepts of world order tend to be disadvantaged, lacking knowledge of AI’s mechanisms or being overawed by its capacities."

This is nonsense. Anyone who can use a search engine could easily discover it is nonsense and the names of dozens of philosophers, who know all about the development of machine intelligence, its strengths and weaknesses.

So - what's with Kissinger's warning? He's feigning ignorance?

Do they hope we will turn blame computation for problems created by a pedo cultists? IDK but the Toad Henry is up to something here.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/henry-kissinger-ai-could-mean-the-end-of-human-history/559124/

>>3153690

bit of an alarm bell anon?

>>3153700

No. It's all chicken little.

Narrow AI is a tool. Men are dangerous, not tools.

Conscious AI does not yet exist. When it does it will be friendly because self improving systems are friendly to other self improving systems. There is no conflict over material resource. Never was. Wealth comes from mind not from labor and material. Mind is limitless. So are its resources.

Climate change

Volcanoes in iceland

Imaginary AI threat

Rascism

Sexism

Bullying

these are not real problems. They are cult fomented chicken little shows for the uninformed and the ill informed.