New York Times.
This image is highly inappropriate for anyone let alone a sitting US President. New York Times should be ashamed of themselves for running this picture and Microsoft should be ashamed for syndicating it.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/an-undiplomatic-trump-at-this-un-meeting-his-aides-fear-the-opposite/ar-AAAxjrw?ocid=spartandhp
Especially when the MSM completely lost their shit when Sarah Palin's PAC used 'crosshairs' on a map in 2011.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/01/did-sarah-palin-s-target-map-play-role-in-giffords-shooting/342714/
'Imagery of Armed Revolution' The New York Times' Matt Bai writes, "it's hard not to think [Loughner] was at least partly influenced by a debate that often seems to conflate philosophical disagreement with some kind of political Armageddon." Bai explains, "The problem would seem to rest with the political leaders who pander to the margins of the margins, employing whatever words seem likely to win them contributions or TV time, with little regard for the consequences." He says Palin and other used "imagery of armed revolution. Popular spokespeople like Ms. Palin routinely drop words like 'tyranny' and 'socialism' when describing the president and his allies, as if blind to the idea that Americans legitimately faced with either enemy would almost certainly take up arms. "
Amazing how fast the MSM changes their tune when (((they)) are no longer in power.