>>3164169

No, not gone.

RR will be gone, when there is PROOF that he resigned.

>>3164204

"reportedly"

>>3164259

Reported that he actually resigned?

Where?

>>3164280

>>3164280

>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/deputy-attorney-general-rod-rosenstein-is-resigning

"Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has verbally resigned to chief of staff John Kelly, according to reports."

"verbally resigned" "according to reports"

That's weak.

>>3164335

Read(!) the articles:

"verbally" "according to reports"

No sauce for these claims.

>>3164367

True.

Many Anons can't determine, what is sauce and what isn't.

And maybe they don't even care.

>>3164411

There isn#t any real sauce that RR has resigned.

Let's wait for real and solid news on that.

>>3164444

True.

>>3164577

She seems to be a nut.

>>3164614

Same here…

>>3164724

She's only reporting, what Axios has been saying.

This isn't a confirmation.

>>3164744

She isn't "credible", when she only reports, what one single source is reporting on.

There is no source saying that RR has really and effectively resigned.

>>3164746

No. Not notable. You're certainly not the smartest Anon here.