>>3164242

The [RR] 'resignation' is simply part of the same trap as Trump being baited into firing him after last week's leaks.

Those who Trump threatens will, in short order, simply say that [RR] was forced to resign. That is the same as Trump firing him (for their purposes).

If you cannot manipulate POTUS to cross the RED LINE then you move the RED LINE.

Remember, accepting someone's resignation is not necessarily the same as being fired. That is the game. If Trump 'accepts' the resignation then it will be reported that Trump fired him (Trump has crossed our RED LINE).

>>3164308

Bongino approaches the coup from an investigator's point of view. Granted, he opines at times but, importantly, he distinguishes what he thinks (speculation) from what he can derive from the facts of the case.

His podcast is refreshing in this era of 'my truth'.

>>3164316

Q has stated repeatedly that [RR] has requested meetings with POTUS which were allegedly DENIED.

Consider who benefits (qui bono) from releasing the purported resignation.

I do not think POTUS nor Kelly released this information. Therefore, [RR] must have released it.

Ask yourself, WHY?

>>3164383

'Expects' to be fired.

So much wrong with this phrase. Expects is a transitive verb which, in this context, means awaits and conveys that the action is happening to the subject of the sentence [RR].

Further, there is a denial of the prior resignation.

YOU ARE WATCHING THE CRAFTING OF THE FALSE NARRATIVE.

POTUS HAS CROSSED THE RED LINE.

>>3164575

Wow